Patterson v. CABALA
730 N.W.2d 249
This text of 730 N.W.2d 249 (Patterson v. CABALA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Patterson v. CABALA, 730 N.W.2d 249 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
Patrick PATTERSON and Susan Patterson, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Gregory Bryan CABALA, Defendant-Appellee, and
Robert Trevino, Defendant/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and
Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan, d/b/a Soaring Eagle Casino, Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 8, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
730 N.W.2d 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-cabala-mich-2007.