Patterson v. Bowie
18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425
This text of 18 F. Cas. 1324 (Patterson v. Bowie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Patterson v. Bowie, 18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425 (circtddc 1807).
Opinion
(nem. con.) quashed the ne exeat with costs of the motion, and ordered the bond to be cancelled. 1st Because the affidavit was insufficient; and 2d. Because a ne exeat ought not to issue against a garnishee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-bowie-circtddc-1807.