Patterson v. Bowie

18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425

This text of 18 F. Cas. 1324 (Patterson v. Bowie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Bowie, 18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425 (circtddc 1807).

Opinion

THE COURT

(nem. con.) quashed the ne exeat with costs of the motion, and ordered the bond to be cancelled. 1st Because the affidavit was insufficient; and 2d. Because a ne exeat ought not to issue against a garnishee.

FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, contra, as to the 2d ground, thinking there might be cases in which there would be a defect of justice if a ne exeat could not issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 F. Cas. 1324, 1 Cranch 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-bowie-circtddc-1807.