Patterson v. Board of Elections
This text of 122 A.D.2d 916 (Patterson v. Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In a proceeding to validate petitions designating Ineze A. Patterson, Priestly L. Taylor, Mary Thompson, Anderson L. Bullock, Van De Vore and Millie Rivas as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for public office and various party positions, and to invalidate petitions designating Barbara Clark, Clarence E. Powell, Adele Rogers, John McRae, Elmer Griffith, Lillie Jones and Ann Wilkinson as candidates in the Democratic Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1986, for public office and various party positions, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Bianchi, J.), dated August 15, 1986, which dismissed the proceeding.
[917]*917Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A review of the record indicates that the Supreme Court, Queens County, acted properly in dismissing the proceeding. Thompson, J. P., Bracken, Niehoff and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.2d 916, 505 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-board-of-elections-nyappdiv-1986.