Patterson v. Barber

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1861

PATRICIA T. PATTERSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JAMES R. BARBER, III; GEORGE FUNDERBURK; SUSAN BARDEN; DAVID HUFFSTERTLER,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (0:10-cv-00025-MBS)

Submitted: September 30, 2010 Decided: October 7, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Patricia T. Patterson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Patricia T. Patterson appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Patterson v. Barber, No. 0:10-cv-00025-MBS (D.S.C.

June 10, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED