Patterson v. Ball
18 F. Cas. 1323, 1 Cranch 571
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided November 15, 1809·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
was of opinion that a lawyer’s fee should be taxed against the complainants, although they styled themselves executors. The defendants having denied that they were executors, have thrown the burden of proof on the plaintiffs. And by dismissing’their bill they have tacitly admitted that they were not competent to sue here as executors. See Law Va. November 19, 1792, p. 98, § 14.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patterson v. Ball, 18 F. Cas. 1323, 1 Cranch 571 (circtddc 1809).
18 F. Cas. 1323 (Patterson v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Goodyear v. Sawyer
17 F. 2 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1883)