Patterson v. Augusta & Savannah Railroad

21 S.E. 283, 94 Ga. 140, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 31
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 21 S.E. 283 (Patterson v. Augusta & Savannah Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patterson v. Augusta & Savannah Railroad, 21 S.E. 283, 94 Ga. 140, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 31 (Ga. 1894).

Opinion

Simmons, Justice.

Patterson brought his. action against the Augusta & Savannah Railroad Company, alleging that he had made a contract with it, whereby it agreed for a certain consideration to transport him safely from the city of Augusta to the city of Waynesboro, on the line of its railroad, and that there was a breach of the contract, in that it did not transport him safely, but that he was injured and damaged by the loss of his arm. Where a person makes a contract of this kind with a common carrier, and he is injured by the negligence of the carrier, he has two remedies, one an action for the breach of •contract, the other an action on the case for the wrong, .and he may elect which remedy he will pursue. If he elects to bring an action for the breach of contract, he has, under the code, four years within which to bring it; if he elects to sue upon the tort, he has two years. [142]*142Code, §§2928, 3060. If he sues upon the breach of contract and there is a final adjudication of this suit upon the merits, he cannot afterwards sue the same defendant on the tort. The plaintiff in this case having brought his action for a breach of the contract, and four years not having elapsed before the filing of the suit, he was in time ; and if he proves the contract alleged with this particular defendant or one of its agents who was authorized to make it, and the alleged breach and injury resulting therefrom, we see no reason why he cannot recover. See Code, §2955 ; Hutchinson on Carriers, §790.

Judgment-reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

DeMOTT v. OLD TOWN TROLLEY TOURS OF SAVANNAH, INC.
760 S.E.2d 703 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014)
Adair v. Baker Bros., Inc.
366 S.E.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1988)
Crites v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
341 S.E.2d 264 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Hamilton v. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy
306 S.E.2d 340 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Holbrook v. City of Sarasota
58 So. 2d 862 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Doyle v. City of Coral Gables
33 So. 2d 41 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1947)
School Dist. No. 18 v. Twin Falls B. T. Co.
12 P.2d 774 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
Howard v. Middlesborough Hospital
47 S.W.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1932)
Bodne v. Austin
2 S.W.2d 100 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1928)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Averett
127 S.E. 217 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Union Warehouse & Compress Co.
122 S.E. 327 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1924)
Baltimore & O. R. v. Reed
223 F. 689 (Sixth Circuit, 1915)
Murray v. Wishkah Boom Co.
137 P. 130 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)
Coplan v. Thompson Transfer Co.
75 S.E. 822 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Southern Express Co. v. Sinclair
68 S.E. 1113 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)
Canaday v. United Railways Co.
114 S.W. 88 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1908)
Rushin v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.
58 S.E. 357 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Aiken v. Southern Railway Co.
62 L.R.A. 666 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 S.E. 283, 94 Ga. 140, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patterson-v-augusta-savannah-railroad-ga-1894.