Patterson, F. v. Tice, E.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
FLOYD E. PATTERSON, JR., : No. 120 MM 2020 :
Petitioner : : :
v. : : :
ERIC TICE, SUPERINTENDENT, : :
Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 19th day of October, 2020, the “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ad Subjiciendum” and the “Motion for the Immediate Relief” are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patterson, F. v. Tice, E., (Pa. 2020).
Patterson, F. v. Tice, E. (Patterson, F. v. Tice, E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.