Patten v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co.
This text of 6 S.E.2d 26 (Patten v. Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
We have given careful study to the arguments of counsel in this appeal, and have given a like consideration to the decree of Judge Oxner. We are satisfied that he has fully considered and decided all the questions made by the pleadings and the arguments and that he has correctly decided them.
The case of Livingston v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company, 173 S. C., 87, 174 S. E., 900, is in apt analogy with the facts, and questions of law involved, and the findings and conclusions of the Court, and is decisive of, the case at bar.
*208 The decree of Judge Oxner is satisfactory to this Court. Let it be reported.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
6 S.E.2d 26, 192 S.C. 189, 126 A.L.R. 91, 1939 S.C. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patten-v-mutual-benefit-life-ins-co-sc-1939.