Patten v. Harris

10 Wend. 623
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1834·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Sutherland, J.

It is with great reluctance that we consent to give leave to the party in this case to plead anew; the demurrer may have been interposed in the hope of its proving successful, but it was not put in with the expectation of its deciding the cause upon the merits, and it cannot ' therefore well be said to have been put in in good faith; but there is an affidavit of merits, and unless the defendant be permitted to plead, the whole cause of action will stand confessed upon the record. Under these circumstances, the defendant is permitted to plead anew, on payment of costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patten v. Harris, 10 Wend. 623 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1834).

10 Wend. 623 (Patten v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McNeil v. Board of Supervisors
131 A.D. 126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Mayberry v. Brackett
72 Me. 102 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1881)
Fisher v. . Gould
81 N.Y. 228 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Osgood v. Whittelsey
10 Abb. Pr. 134 (New York Supreme Court, 1860)
Darrow v. Miller
5 How. Pr. 247 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Gill v. Stebbins
10 F. Cas. 379 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1828)
Vermont v. Society for the Propagation of the Gospel
28 F. Cas. 1155 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Vermont, 1827)
Griswold v. Haskins
1 Johns. Cas. 135 (New York Supreme Court, 1799)