Patten v. City of Centralia

47 Ill. 370
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 47 Ill. 370 (Patten v. City of Centralia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patten v. City of Centralia, 47 Ill. 370 (Ill. 1868).

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese

delivered the opinion of the Court:

This judgment must be reversed, for the reason that the instruction given by the court on behalf of the prosecution makes the offense to consist in merely opening the saloon, when the ordinance under which the prosecution was instituted provides, if any person shall keep open any tippling house oil the Sabbath day or night, every person so offending shall, on conviction, be fined, etc. Merely opening the door of a tippling house on Sunday would not constitute the offense aimed at by this ordinance. It must be kept open, as on week days, for tippling purposes, and nothing of that kind was proved in the case.

It was erroneous, also, to modify defendant’s second instruc tion. As asked, it was as follows: Unless you are satisfied from the evidence that the room called the saloon was a place where the defendant kept spirituous liquors for sale by the small quantity, you should find the defendant not guilty.

The court modified this instruction by adding after the words, spirituous liquors, the words, “ or other drinks.” By this instruction, as modified, if soda water, sarsaparilla, or any other cooling or refreshing drink, not spirituous, were sold, the vendor could not escape conviction. He would be equally liable to punishment with the vendor of whiskey or other spirituous beverages. Such is not the law.

To constitute a tippling house, it is necessary that intoxicating drinks should be sold therein.

The judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. City of Oklahoma v. Robertson
1907 OK 135 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1907)
Lingelbach v. Hobson
107 N.W. 168 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1906)
City of Louisiana v. Anderson
73 S.W. 875 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Jeffries v. State
52 Ark. 420 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 Ill. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patten-v-city-of-centralia-ill-1868.