Patten v. Cilley

First Circuit

Patten v. Cilley

50 F. 337, 1 C.C.A. 522, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 22, 1892·No. No. 1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Webb, District Judge.

We think that there has been no final decision in the circuit court, and that this court has no jurisdiction in error in the present stage of the case. Under the decision of the supreme court in Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins, 114 U. S. 262, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 880, the defendant in error is entitled to a judgment for the costs arising on the motion to dismiss. It is accordingly ordered that the writ of error be dismissed, with costs for the defendant incident to the motion to dismiss, including any costs incurred by him in printing the record, and that a mandate issue forthwith,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Webb, District Judge.

We think that there has been no final decision in the circuit court, and that this court has no jurisdiction in error in the present stage of the case. Under the decision of the supreme court in Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins, 114 U. S. 262, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 880, the defendant in error is entitled to a judgment for the costs arising on the motion to dismiss. It is accordingly ordered that the writ of error be dismissed, with costs for the defendant incident to the motion to dismiss, including any costs incurred by him in printing the record, and that a mandate issue forthwith,

Patten v. Cilley, 50 F. 337, 1 C.C.A. 522, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243 (1st Cir. 1892).

Pincite

50 F. 337 (Patten v. Cilley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related