Patten v. Cilley

50 F. 337, 1 C.C.A. 522, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedApril 22, 1892
DocketNo. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 50 F. 337 (Patten v. Cilley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patten v. Cilley, 50 F. 337, 1 C.C.A. 522, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243 (1st Cir. 1892).

Opinion

Webb, District Judge.

We think that there has been no final decision in the circuit court, and that this court has no jurisdiction in error in the present stage of the case. Under the decision of the supreme court in Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins, 114 U. S. 262, 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 880, the defendant in error is entitled to a judgment for the costs arising on the motion to dismiss. It is accordingly ordered that the writ of error be dismissed, with costs for the defendant incident to the motion to dismiss, including any costs incurred by him in printing the record, and that a mandate issue forthwith,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lockhart v. New York Life Ins.
71 F.2d 684 (Fourth Circuit, 1934)
Arthur v. Edmunds
66 F.2d 21 (Fifth Circuit, 1933)
Patten v. Cilley
62 F. 497 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Hampshire, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
50 F. 337, 1 C.C.A. 522, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1243, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patten-v-cilley-ca1-1892.