Pattee v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Pattee v. Moore

94 A. 265, 77 N.H. 603, 1915 N.H. LEXIS 40

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided May 4, 1915·Published

Opinion

*604 Young, J.

Whether the decree should be modified was a question of fact; consequently the only question of law raised by the defendant’s exception is whether there was any evidence to sustain the court’s finding. Instead of there being no evidence to sustain the court’s conclusion, it is the only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence. „

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*604 Young, J.

Whether the decree should be modified was a question of fact; consequently the only question of law raised by the defendant’s exception is whether there was any evidence to sustain the court’s finding. Instead of there being no evidence to sustain the court’s conclusion, it is the only conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence. „

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Pattee v. Moore, 94 A. 265, 77 N.H. 603, 1915 N.H. LEXIS 40 (N.H. 1915).

Pincite

94 A. 265 (Pattee v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.