Patt v. United States
This text of 162 F.2d 718 (Patt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel, and it appearing that the sole question presented is the propriety of certain supplemental instructions given (he jury by the District Court prior to the rendition of the verdict, which instructions were not excepted to at the time, and no reversible error appearing in the supplemental instructions so given, Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 501, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed 528, it is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 F.2d 718, 1947 U.S. App. LEXIS 2178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patt-v-united-states-ca6-1947.