Patsy B. Anderton v. City of Cedar Hill, Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 19, 2015·No. 05-12-00969-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered January 14, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-00969-CV

PATSY B. ANDERTON AND DOYLE ANDERTON, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A A-1 GRASS SAND AND STONE, Appellants

V.

CITY OF CEDAR HILL, TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 09-12187

ORDER Appellee City of City Hill’s January 8, 2015 motion for leave to file a supplemental brief

is GRANTED. Appellee’s supplemental brief is deemed FILED on January 8, 2015.

Pursuant to appellants Patsy B. Anderton and Doyle Anderton, individually and d/b/a A-1

Grass Sand and Stone’s January 12, 2015 letter request to respond to appellee’s supplemental

brief, we GRANT appellants’ request and any response shall be filed by January 20, 2015.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patsy B. Anderton v. City of Cedar Hill, Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Patsy B. Anderton v. City of Cedar Hill, Texas (Patsy B. Anderton v. City of Cedar Hill, Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.