Patron v. Patron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Patron v. Patron

41 A.D.2d 732, 341 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4835

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 26, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.D.2d 732 (Patron v. Patron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patron v. Patron, 41 A.D.2d 732, 341 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4835 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 6, 1972, awarding plaintiff diverse post-judgment relief, to enable her to prosecute an appeal from [733]*733a judgment awarding her husband a separation, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking therefrom the provision granting leave to plaintiff to apply to Special Term for an additional counsel fee, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The fee awarded at Special Term appears to be sufficient to cover the services contemplated, inclusive of this intermediate appeal. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 6, 1972, awarding plaintiff diverse post-judgment relief, to enable her to prosecute an appeal from [733]*733a judgment awarding her husband a separation, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to the extent of striking therefrom the provision granting leave to plaintiff to apply to Special Term for an additional counsel fee, and as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The fee awarded at Special Term appears to be sufficient to cover the services contemplated, inclusive of this intermediate appeal. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Nunez, Kupferman, Murphy and Capozzoli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 A.D.2d 732, 341 N.Y.S.2d 1015, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patron-v-patron-nyappdiv-1973.