Patron v. Greyhound Bus Line

Second Circuit

Patron v. Greyhound Bus Line

215 F. App'x 63

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 30, 2007·No. No. 05-3717-cv·Published

Opinion

[64]*64SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Minerva Patron, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for .the Southern District of New York (Wood, J.) dismissing her complaint as time-barred and holding that equitable tolling was not applicable. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s order entered December 10, 2004, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[64]*64SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-appellant Minerva Patron, pro se, appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for .the Southern District of New York (Wood, J.) dismissing her complaint as time-barred and holding that equitable tolling was not applicable. The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. For the reasons stated in the District Court’s order entered December 10, 2004, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Patron v. Greyhound Bus Line, 215 F. App'x 63 (2d Cir. 2007).

Pincite

215 F. App'x 63 (Patron v. Greyhound Bus Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.