Patriotic Bank ex rel. Johnson v. Wilson
This text of 18 F. Cas. 1305 (Patriotic Bank ex rel. Johnson v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(■nem. con.) instructed the jury that if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that the money was received by Mr. Weightman as payment of the note, this suit could not be maintained upon it in the name of the bank; but if they should be of opinion that it was a sale or an assignment of the note, for a valuable consideration, bond fide, then this suit might be maintained in the name of the bank for the use of Mr. Johnson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 F. Cas. 1305, 4 D.C. 253, 4 Cranch 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patriotic-bank-ex-rel-johnson-v-wilson-circtddc-1832.