Patrick's Fine Foliage v. Morales-Crespo
This text of 444 So. 2d 1158 (Patrick's Fine Foliage v. Morales-Crespo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this workers’ compensation appeal the employer and carrier contend the deputy commissioner erred in awarding wage loss benefits; attorney’s fees based on a finding of bad faith; and in making a prospective finding with respect to future entitlement to attorney’s fees. We affirm the order, but strike the improper language dealing with future entitlement to attorney’s fees, see B.P. Construction, Inc. v. Garcia, 440 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Santa Rosa Marble, Inc. v. Ubieta, 436 So.2d 311 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); and City of Leesburg v. Padgett, 397 So.2d 732 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). In all other respects the order is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
444 So. 2d 1158, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 12017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricks-fine-foliage-v-morales-crespo-fladistctapp-1984.