Patrick v. United States
52 Cust. Ct. 334
United States Customs Court·Decided April 30, 1964·No. No. 68503; protest 62/11527 (Galveston)·Published
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the dry charging machine in question consists of an oven, which has as an essential feature an electrical element or device, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patrick v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 334 (cusc 1964).
52 Cust. Ct. 334 (Patrick v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.