Patrick v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Patrick v. State

91 So. 3d 761, 2012 WL 1139158

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided April 6, 2012·No. 1100964·Published

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

MALONE, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, and PARKER, JJ., concur. MAIN and WISE, JJ., recuse themselves.*

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHAW, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

MALONE, C.J., and WOODALL, STUART, and PARKER, JJ., concur. MAIN and WISE, JJ., recuse themselves.*

Patrick v. State, 91 So. 3d 761, 2012 WL 1139158 (Ala. 2012).

Pincite

91 So. 3d 761 (Patrick v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related