Patrick v. Rosenblatt
This text of 44 F. App'x 861 (Patrick v. Rosenblatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Thomas D. Patrick appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his Bivens action against Arizona federal district court judges Paul G. Rosenblatt and Susan R. Bolton. The Nevada district court properly dismissed Patrick’s complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendants, Doe v. American Nat’l Red Cross, 112 F.3d 1048, 1050-52 (9th Cir.1997), and based upon absolute judicial immunity, Moore v. Brewster, 96 F.3d 1240, 1243-44 (9th Cir.1996). We reject Patrick’s pending motion as lacking merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F. App'x 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-rosenblatt-ca9-2002.