Patrick v. Riebow

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Patrick v. Riebow

705 So. 2d 1086, 1998 La. LEXIS 160, 1998 WL 12433

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 9, 1998

DocketNo. 97-CD-3093

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 705 So. 2d 1086 (Patrick v. Riebow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patrick v. Riebow, 705 So. 2d 1086, 1998 La. LEXIS 160, 1998 WL 12433 (La. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Patrick, Myra Ann;—Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 516-137.

Granted. Where relator is seeking review of the denial of an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the clerk of court shall allow the application to be filed without the pay[1087]*1087ment of costs. Application transferred to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits without the payment of a filing fee.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Patrick, Myra Ann;—Plaintiffs); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “O”, No. 516-137.

Granted. Where relator is seeking review of the denial of an application to proceed in forma pauperis, the clerk of court shall allow the application to be filed without the pay[1087]*1087ment of costs. Application transferred to the court of appeal for consideration on the merits without the payment of a filing fee.

JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

705 So. 2d 1086, 1998 La. LEXIS 160, 1998 WL 12433, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-riebow-la-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack