Patrick v. Pilot Life Insurance Company

86 S.E.2d 201, 241 N.C. 614, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 428
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 9, 1955
Docket93
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E.2d 201 (Patrick v. Pilot Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick v. Pilot Life Insurance Company, 86 S.E.2d 201, 241 N.C. 614, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 428 (N.C. 1955).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff seeks to get around the exclusion clause in the policy by claiming the clause is contrary to the optional standard provision as set out in G.S. 58-253 (6). The section cited refers to the unlawful conduct of the insured. In this case it is admitted that the insured was without fault. The section cited, therefore, has no applica *615 tion. On the authority of Whitaker v. Insurance Co., 213 N.C. 376, 196 S.E. 328, the judgment is

Affirmed.

BaeNhill, 0. J., and DeviN, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mills v. State Life and Health Insurance Company
135 S.E.2d 586 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)
Slaughter v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
108 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E.2d 201, 241 N.C. 614, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-pilot-life-insurance-company-nc-1955.