Patrick v. Patrick

102 A. 980, 30 Del. 75, 7 Boyce 75, 1918 Del. LEXIS 12
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedFebruary 4, 1918
DocketAlias Divorce, No. 19; No. 53
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 102 A. 980 (Patrick v. Patrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick v. Patrick, 102 A. 980, 30 Del. 75, 7 Boyce 75, 1918 Del. LEXIS 12 (Del. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curam:

We think; that petitions in divorce proceedings, and answers when necessary, are the pleadings in those cases, and we see no reason why the court should not, in its discretion, allow an answer to be withdrawn and other action taken. Of course, if it were apparent that this course was being pursued for the purpose of delaying the hearing of the case, that would be a matter for the court to pass upon, but that question is not raised in this case.

We think we should allow the answer to be withdrawn at this time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atkinson v. North American Smelting Co.
245 A.2d 436 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1968)
Grandillo v. Pennsylvania Railroad
162 A. 349 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1932)
State v. Adair
117 A. 20 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1922)
Elbert v. Wilmington Turngemeinde
107 A. 215 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 A. 980, 30 Del. 75, 7 Boyce 75, 1918 Del. LEXIS 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-patrick-delsuperct-1918.