Patrick v. Hess
This text of Patrick v. Hess (Patrick v. Hess) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
JOHN T. PATRICK, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D15-5449 ) RICHARD HESS and MEREDITH ) HESS, husband and wife, and ) LUCRE, INC., a Nevada corporation, ) ) Appellees. ) ________________________________ )
Opinion filed March 3, 2017.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Keith R. Kyle, Judge.
Robert L. Donald of Law Office of Robert L. Donald, Fort Myers, for Appellant.
Elisa S. Worthington of Elisa S. Worthington, P.A., Pineland, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the order on appeal requiring sale of the homestead property
because it cannot be practically divided. Our affirmance is without prejudice to any
argument appellant may have with regard to the allocation of the proceeds of the sale.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, KHOUZAM, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patrick v. Hess, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-hess-fladistctapp-2017.