Patrick v. Harding

260 A.D. 836

This text of 260 A.D. 836 (Patrick v. Harding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick v. Harding, 260 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

Orders affirmed, without costs. All concur. (In a mandamus proceeding to compel defendant to employ petitioner and others as' truck drivers six days a week, one order denies petitioner’s motion to bring in other party-petitioners, to refer the proceeding back to the official referee for additional testimony, and for an order rejecting the report of the official referee, and the other order confirms the report of the official referee and dismisses the proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D. 836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-harding-nyappdiv-1940.