Patrick v. Harding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Patrick v. Harding

260 A.D. 836

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 1940·Published

Opinion

Orders affirmed, without costs. All concur. (In a mandamus proceeding to compel defendant to employ petitioner and others as' truck drivers six days a week, one order denies petitioner’s motion to bring in other party-petitioners, to refer the proceeding back to the official referee for additional testimony, and for an order rejecting the report of the official referee, and the other order confirms the report of the official referee and dismisses the proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders affirmed, without costs. All concur. (In a mandamus proceeding to compel defendant to employ petitioner and others as' truck drivers six days a week, one order denies petitioner’s motion to bring in other party-petitioners, to refer the proceeding back to the official referee for additional testimony, and for an order rejecting the report of the official referee, and the other order confirms the report of the official referee and dismisses the proceeding.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and McCurn, JJ.

Patrick v. Harding, 260 A.D. 836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

260 A.D. 836 (Patrick v. Harding) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.