Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.

198 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3890
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1967
DocketNo. 35477
StatusPublished

This text of 198 So. 2d 825 (Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co., 198 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3890 (Fla. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have been asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company, 185 So.2d 522.

The petition reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and we issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the decisions relied upon by the Petitioner present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., DREW, J., and Mc-MULLEN, Circuit Judge, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company
185 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-v-faircloth-buick-co-fla-1967.