Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.

198 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3890
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1967·No. No. 35477·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of certiorari we have been asked to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, in the case of Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company, 185 So.2d 522.

The petition reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court and we issued the writ and have heard oral argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the decisions relied upon by the Petitioner present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 4, Florida Constitution, F.S.A. The writ is discharged.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THORNAL, C. J., DREW, J., and Mc-MULLEN, Circuit Judge, dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co., 198 So. 2d 825, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3890 (Fla. 1967).

198 So. 2d 825 (Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Patrick v. Faircloth Buick Company
185 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)