Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh

Ninth Circuit

Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh

677 F. App'x 321

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 30, 2017

Docket15-17205

StatusUnpublished

This text of 677 F. App'x 321 (Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patrick Takeuchi v. John McHugh, 677 F. App'x 321 (9th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Patrick Takeuchi appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his Title VII action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Vinieratos v. U.S. Dep’t of Air Force Through Aldridge, 939 F.2d 762, 767-68 (9th Cir. 1991). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Takeuchi’s Title VII action because Takeu-chi failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See id. at 772 (“The law requires an aggrieved federal employee to elect one exclusive administrative remedy and to exhaust whatever remedy he chooses.”).

We do not consider claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.

***

xhis disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid- . ed by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI