Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States

391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1968·No. 21137·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with having unlawfully possessed an unregistered firearm, an offense proscribed by 26 U.S.C. § 5851. Prior to their trial, they moved that the indictment be dismissed. They based their motion upon the claim that enforcement of the cited statute would infringe upon their constitutional rights against required self-incrimination. It has now been established that their motion, denied by the District Court, should have been granted. Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 Sup.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968).

Upon remand, the indictment will be dismissed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States, 391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003 (9th Cir. 1968).

391 F.2d 607 (Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related