Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States

391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 20, 1968
Docket21137
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 607 (Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States, 391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with having unlawfully possessed an unregistered firearm, an offense proscribed by 26 U.S.C. § 5851. Prior to their trial, they moved that the indictment be dismissed. They based their motion upon the claim that enforcement of the cited statute would infringe upon their constitutional rights against required self-incrimination. It has now been established that their motion, denied by the District Court, should have been granted. Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 Sup.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968).

Upon remand, the indictment will be dismissed.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-r-cedillo-and-benito-juvera-v-united-states-ca9-1968.