Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States
This text of 391 F.2d 607 (Patrick R. Cedillo and Benito Juvera v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants were convicted under an indictment charging them with having unlawfully possessed an unregistered firearm, an offense proscribed by 26 U.S.C. § 5851. Prior to their trial, they moved that the indictment be dismissed. They based their motion upon the claim that enforcement of the cited statute would infringe upon their constitutional rights against required self-incrimination. It has now been established that their motion, denied by the District Court, should have been granted. Haynes v. United States, 390 U.S. 85, 88 Sup.Ct. 722, 19 L.Ed.2d 923 (1968).
Upon remand, the indictment will be dismissed.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 F.2d 607, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8003, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-r-cedillo-and-benito-juvera-v-united-states-ca9-1968.