Patrick Neal Jackson v. Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Marriott Courtyard and CBM Three Hotels LLC D/B/A Marriott Courtyard
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
FORT WORTH
NO. 02-14-00361-CV
PATRICK NEAL JACKSON APPELLANT V.
COURTYARD MANAGEMENT APPELLEES CORPORATION D/B/A MARRIOTT COURTYARD AND CBM THREE HOTELS LLC D/B/A MARRIOTT COURTYARD
------------
FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 096-265590-13
------------
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On May 11, 2015, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. DELIVERED: June 18, 2015
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patrick Neal Jackson v. Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Marriott Courtyard and CBM Three Hotels LLC D/B/A Marriott Courtyard (Patrick Neal Jackson v. Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Marriott Courtyard and CBM Three Hotels LLC D/B/A Marriott Courtyard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.