Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant

Ninth Circuit

Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant

103 F.3d 827, 96 Daily Journal DAR 15306, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9293, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33220, 1996 WL 730493

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 20, 1996·No. 95-99003·Published·Cited by 70 cases

Opinion

On August 29, 1996, the Court directed the parties to submit briefs on the question of whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (“Act”) applied to cases filed prior to the Act’s effective date. This issue has been fully briefed and was submitted on oral argument on November 20, 1996.

A number of Ninth Circuit panels have stayed decisions pending resolution of this question. Accordingly, we have elected to announce our decision prior to issuing an opinion.

We hold that the amendments to Chapter 153 of Title 28 of the United States Code contained in Title I of the Act do not apply to cases filed in the federal courts of this Circuit prior to the Act’s effective date of April 24, 1996. A full opinion detailing the rationale for our decision, along with a decision on the merits, will be forthcoming, together with any separate concurring or dissenting opinions which members of the en bane panel may wish to file.

Judges GOODWIN, BRUNETTI and HAWKINS dissent from the issuance of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On August 29, 1996, the Court directed the parties to submit briefs on the question of whether the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214 (“Act”) applied to cases filed prior to the Act’s effective date. This issue has been fully briefed and was submitted on oral argument on November 20, 1996.

A number of Ninth Circuit panels have stayed decisions pending resolution of this question. Accordingly, we have elected to announce our decision prior to issuing an opinion.

We hold that the amendments to Chapter 153 of Title 28 of the United States Code contained in Title I of the Act do not apply to cases filed in the federal courts of this Circuit prior to the Act’s effective date of April 24, 1996. A full opinion detailing the rationale for our decision, along with a decision on the merits, will be forthcoming, together with any separate concurring or dissenting opinions which members of the en bane panel may wish to file.

Judges GOODWIN, BRUNETTI and HAWKINS dissent from the issuance of this order.

Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant, 103 F.3d 827, 96 Daily Journal DAR 15306, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9293, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 33220, 1996 WL 730493 (9th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

103 F.3d 827 (Patrick James JEFFRIES, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Tana WOOD, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related