Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2014·No. 01-13-00239-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued February 20, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00239-CV ——————————— PATRICK HURD, Appellant V. BRAESWOOD ATRIUM, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1027476

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Patrick Hurd, has neither paid the required fees nor established

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also

TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order

Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket

No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).

Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing

the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this

appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of

prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium (Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.