Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium
This text of Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium (Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued February 20, 2014
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00239-CV ——————————— PATRICK HURD, Appellant V. BRAESWOOD ATRIUM, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 1027476
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Patrick Hurd, has neither paid the required fees nor established
indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also
TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013); Order
Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
Further, appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing
the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this
appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See TEX. R.
APP. P. 5, 42.3(b), (c).
We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees and for want of
prosecution. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Huddle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Patrick Hurd v. Braeswood Atrium, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-hurd-v-braeswood-atrium-texapp-2014.