Patrick Henry Featherston v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 24, 2018·No. 10-18-00143-CR·Published

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-18-00143-CR

PATRICK HENRY FEATHERSTON, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 1 Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-00865-CRM-CCL1

ORDER

Appellant Patrick Henry Featherston has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Although Appellant’s attorney has signed the motion, Appellant

has not personally signed the motion. See id. (“The appellant and his or her attorney must

sign the written motion to dismiss . . . .”). The motion to dismiss is therefore denied

without prejudice to the filing of a motion to dismiss that complies with Rule 42.2(a).

PER CURIAM Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Order issued and filed October 24, 2018

Featherston v. State Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick Henry Featherston v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Patrick Henry Featherston v. State (Patrick Henry Featherston v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.