Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready

458 F.2d 1359, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 25, 1972·No. 71-1968·Published

Opinion

*1360 PER CURIAM.

In this case appellant contends that the District Judge dismissed his complaint which sounds in both diversity and civil rights on the grounds of immunity, when in fact, some, if not all of the defendants, are not immune.

Noting, however, that the Judge had before him a motion to dismiss on grounds of the various statutes of limitations which would be applicable to the causes of action sought to be presented herein, and that on the conceded facts all of the actions are plainly barred, the appeal is hereby dismissed under Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See Minchella v. Estate of Skillman, 356 F.2d 52 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 861, 87 S.Ct. 114, 17 L.Ed.2d 87 (1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready, 458 F.2d 1359, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351 (6th Cir. 1972).

458 F.2d 1359 (Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Minchella v. Estate of Skillman
356 F.2d 52 (Sixth Circuit, 1966)