Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready

Sixth Circuit

Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready

458 F.2d 1359, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMay 25, 1972

Docket71-1968

StatusPublished

This text of 458 F.2d 1359 (Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patrick H. O'ShaughneSSy v. William McCready, 458 F.2d 1359, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351 (6th Cir. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

*1360 PER CURIAM.

In this case appellant contends that the District Judge dismissed his complaint which sounds in both diversity and civil rights on the grounds of immunity, when in fact, some, if not all of the defendants, are not immune.

Noting, however, that the Judge had before him a motion to dismiss on grounds of the various statutes of limitations which would be applicable to the causes of action sought to be presented herein, and that on the conceded facts all of the actions are plainly barred, the appeal is hereby dismissed under Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See Minchella v. Estate of Skillman, 356 F.2d 52 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 861, 87 S.Ct. 114, 17 L.Ed.2d 87 (1966).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*1360 PER CURIAM.

In this case appellant contends that the District Judge dismissed his complaint which sounds in both diversity and civil rights on the grounds of immunity, when in fact, some, if not all of the defendants, are not immune.

Noting, however, that the Judge had before him a motion to dismiss on grounds of the various statutes of limitations which would be applicable to the causes of action sought to be presented herein, and that on the conceded facts all of the actions are plainly barred, the appeal is hereby dismissed under Rules 8 and 9 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See Minchella v. Estate of Skillman, 356 F.2d 52 (6th Cir.), cert denied, 385 U.S. 861, 87 S.Ct. 114, 17 L.Ed.2d 87 (1966).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

458 F.2d 1359, 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 9351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-h-oshaughnessy-v-william-mccready-ca6-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack