Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State

DecidedFebruary 26, 2015

Docket01-14-00927-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State (Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

m'7S\ FIRST COURT OF APPEALS « 301 Fannin StijBfetsWa P-.\ CM \^7Hou8ton- T^ff$ppt^US8NESS S"£aV RE: CaseSOTfefilsiPAS Style: Patrick EaflTSfHSK- Ur ZIP 77002 v. The State BWMME USE 02 W 0001372104 FEB 06 2015 This is NOTICE to the parties and the trial court that the time for filing the APPELLANT'S brief has expired. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(2). If this Court does not receive a motion requesting an extension of time along with appellant's brief or a motion to extend time to file appellant's brief within ten (10) days of the date of this notice, it must order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing on the record to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(2) . C, Case # 1445769 Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court' Patrick Earl Ruffin I A 3131 Hayes Houston, TX 77082 A NTXT E T7 3T '4E i:S'i"9" 72.i0Z/Zl'/15 RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD * "* e? ?* -* fa •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

m'7S\ FIRST COURT OF APPEALS « 301 Fannin StijBfetsWa P-.\ CM \^7Hou8ton- T^ff$ppt^US8NESS S"£aV RE: CaseSOTfefilsiPAS Style: Patrick EaflTSfHSK- Ur ZIP 77002 v. The State BWMME USE 02 W 0001372104 FEB 06 2015 This is NOTICE to the parties and the trial court that the time for filing the APPELLANT'S brief has expired. Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(2). If this Court does not receive a motion requesting an extension of time along with appellant's brief or a motion to extend time to file appellant's brief within ten (10) days of the date of this notice, it must order the trial court to immediately conduct a hearing on the record to determine whether the appellant desires to prosecute his appeal, whether the appellant is indigent, or, if not indigent, whether counsel has abandoned the appeal, and to make appropriate findings and recommendations. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(2) . C, Case # 1445769 Christopher A. Prine, Clerk of the Court' Patrick Earl Ruffin I A 3131 Hayes Houston, TX 77082 A NTXT E T7 3T '4E i:S'i"9" 72.i0Z/Zl'/15 RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD * "* e? ?* -* fa •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Patrick Earl Ruffin, Jr. v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-earl-ruffin-jr-v-state-texapp-2015.