PATRICK BOYD v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2021·No. 21-1856·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICK BOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-1856

[December 22, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 05-015814CF10A.

Patrick Boyd, Raiford, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Roughton v. State, 185 So. 3d 1207, 1210 (Fla. 2016) (as to Issue 1); Burgess v. State, 831 So. 2d 137, 142 (Fla. 2002) (as to Issue 2); see Cadet v. State, 274 So. 3d 1178, 1179–80 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019) (as to Issue 3).

WARNER, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATRICK BOYD v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2021).

PATRICK BOYD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (PATRICK BOYD v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burgess v. State
831 So. 2d 137 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
James Houston Roughton v. State of Florida
185 So. 3d 1207 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
Cadet v. State
274 So. 3d 1178 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)