Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States

Ninth Circuit

Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States

385 F.2d 418

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedNovember 16, 1967

Docket21450

StatusPublished

This text of 385 F.2d 418 (Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States, 385 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court’s ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.

We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court’s ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.

We affirm.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

385 F.2d 418, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-arthur-roberts-v-united-states-ca9-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack