Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States

385 F.2d 418
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1967·No. 21450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the judgment of the district court convicting him of violating the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). His assignments all concern the sufficiency of the evidence to support the finding of guilt and the propriety of the court’s ruling permitting the prosecution to reopen its case in chief. None has merit, nor tenders a question which on this record warrants discussion in an opinion.

We affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States, 385 F.2d 418 (9th Cir. 1967).

385 F.2d 418 (Patrick Arthur Roberts v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related