PATRICK A. SANTERAMO v. STATE OF FLORIDA

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2018
Docket16-1688
StatusPublished

This text of PATRICK A. SANTERAMO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (PATRICK A. SANTERAMO v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
PATRICK A. SANTERAMO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

PATRICK A. SANTERAMO, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

No. 4D16-1688

[June 6, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2012-010218- CF-10A.

Larry S. Davis and Shana J. Korda of Larry S. Davis, P.A., Hollywood, and Benedict P. Kuehne, Michael T. Davis, and Susan Dmitrovsky of Kuehne Davis Law, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant was tried by a jury and found guilty of money laundering, three counts of violating campaign contribution laws, two counts of organized scheme to defraud, and two counts of grand theft. The State concedes that the defendant will be placed in double jeopardy if convicted of both organized scheme to defraud and grand theft based on the same conduct. See, e.g., Pizzo v. State, 945 So. 2d 1203, 1207 (Fla. 2006). While the trial court recognized the double jeopardy issue, it failed to dismiss the grand theft counts. Instead, adjudication and sentencing were “deferred” as to those counts.

We affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences for money laundering, violating campaign contribution laws, and organized scheme to defraud. We reverse the deferrals of adjudication and remand for dismissal of the grand theft counts.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded. GERBER, C.J., GROSS and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pizzo v. State
945 So. 2d 1203 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
PATRICK A. SANTERAMO v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patrick-a-santeramo-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.