Patricia Thomas v. MO Jackson County

333 F. App'x 142
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 7, 2009
Docket08-1799
StatusUnpublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 142 (Patricia Thomas v. MO Jackson County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patricia Thomas v. MO Jackson County, 333 F. App'x 142 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Patricia Thomas appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal without prejudice of her civil rights action and denial of her motion for default judgment. After careful review, we conclude that Thomas did not properly serve defendants, and that the district court did not abuse its discretion in granting defendants’ motion to dismiss on that basis. See Marshall v. Warwick, 155 F.3d 1027, 1030 (8th Cir.1998) (standards of review); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d), (e), (m); Mo.Rev.Stat. § 506.150.4. In addition, we find no abuse of discretion in the denial of default judgment. See Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai, 351 F.3d 825, 830 (8th Cir.2003) (court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion for default judgment where defendants were never properly served, and thus had no obligation to file answer).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Nanette K. Laughrey, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marilyn M. Marshall v. Mikel Warwick
155 F.3d 1027 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
Norsyn, Inc. v. Desai
351 F.3d 825 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 F. App'x 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-thomas-v-mo-jackson-county-ca8-2009.