Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan

Michigan Supreme Court

Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan

DecidedMay 2, 2017

Docket154356

StatusPublished

This text of Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan (Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan, (Mich. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

154356 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, PATRICIA SOLIS and BENJAMIN SOLIS, Justices Plaintiffs, v SC: 154356 COA: 326259 Wayne CC: 12-004379-NO THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and THE GREENER SIDE, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of March 7, 2017, this Court requested the third-party defendant- appellant to file a brief responding to the third-party plaintiff-appellee’s argument that a settlement agreement between these two parties has rendered this application moot. On order of the Court, the response having been received, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the matter raised was rendered moot by the settlement of the two parties.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 2, 2017 t0424 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

May 2, 2017 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

154356 Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, PATRICIA SOLIS and BENJAMIN SOLIS, Justices Plaintiffs, v SC: 154356 COA: 326259 Wayne CC: 12-004379-NO THE KROGER COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant/ Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and THE GREENER SIDE, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of March 7, 2017, this Court requested the third-party defendant- appellant to file a brief responding to the third-party plaintiff-appellee’s argument that a settlement agreement between these two parties has rendered this application moot. On order of the Court, the response having been received, the application for leave to appeal the July 26, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered, and it is DENIED, because the matter raised was rendered moot by the settlement of the two parties.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. May 2, 2017 t0424 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Patricia Solis v. the Kroger Co of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-solis-v-the-kroger-co-of-michigan-mich-2017.