Patricia Laucella v. Medtronic, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California·Decided July 1, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-00466·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PATRICIA LAUCELLA, individually Case No.: 2:25-cv-00466-SB-PVCx 11 and on behalf of the Estate of ERIK LOMIS; NATALIA JOVOVICH; and ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 MEDTRONIC, INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 INTRODUCTION 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 22 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 23 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 24 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 25 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 26 The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections 27 on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from 1 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties 2 further acknowledge that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 3 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 4 procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 5 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. Specifically, under Civil 6 Local Rule 79-5, the parties acknowledge that if any party seeks to file under seal 7 any Protected Material it must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected 8 Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the 9 sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file 10 Protected Material under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may 11 file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 12 Good cause exists to support the entry of this protective order. Plaintiffs’ 13 Complaint alleges that Plaintiffs were damaged by the wrongful death of Decedent, 14 Erik Lomis (“Decedent”). SAC ¶ 1. Plaintiffs further allege that a manufacturing 15 defect present in the Medtronic Evera™ XT DR DDBB1D4 (“the Device”) 16 implanted in Decedent caused the event. Id. ¶ 2. As such, discovery in this action 17 will necessarily include disclosure of Decedent’s confidential health records as well 18 as trade secrets, valuable research and development information, and other financial, 19 technical, and proprietary information related to the Device for which special 20 protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 21 prosecution of this action is warranted. See, e.g., United States ex rel. Dan Abrams 22 Co. LLC v. Medtronic, Inc., No. 215CV01212JAKASX, 2021 WL 5113487, at *1 23 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2021). Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to 24 facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery 25 materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep 26 confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of 27 such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling 1 information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information 2 will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so 3 designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, 4 non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public 5 record of this case. 7 The parties have hereby stipulated and agreed, and therefore IT IS 8 ORDERED, that all discovery, including documents produced in this action, shall 9 be subject to the following restrictions, and that the following terms and conditions 10 shall govern the treatment of Confidential Information. 11 1. Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” refers to 12 information, documents, or other material that the designating party reasonably and 13 in good faith believes constitutes or reflects trade secrets or information whose 14 confidentiality is otherwise protectable under applicable law. This includes but is 15 not limited to confidential research, development, or commercial information, 16 personal medical information, private personal information, protected health 17 information, tax returns, and other information reasonably sought to be kept 18 confidential. 19 2. Designation of Confidential Information. Any party may 20 reasonably designate any document containing Confidential Information, or portion 21 thereof, which it may produce as “Confidential” by labeling the document to be so 22 designated substantially as follows: “CONFIDENTIAL: SUBJECT TO 23 PROTECTIVE ORDER.” The designation CONFIDENTIAL: SUBJECT TO 24 PROTECTIVE ORDER does not mean that the document has any status or 25 protection by statute or otherwise except to the extent and for the purposes of this 26 Order. 27 3. Use of Confidential Information. Anyone who is provided with 1 solely in connection with this action, shall keep such information strictly 2 confidential, and shall in no way disclose such information, or any portion, 3 summary, abstract or other derivation thereof, to any firm, person, or entity, except 4 as provided in paragraph 4. No party may withhold any responsive document from 5 production on the basis that it contains or constitutes Confidential Information. This 6 Protective Order is intended to facilitate the disclosure of such information, not 7 prevent it. 8 4. Disclosure of Confidential Information. Access to Confidential 9 Information shall be limited to: 10 (a) Attorneys. Attorneys of record and other personnel in their law 11 firm(s) (including other attorneys, paralegals, and other staff 12 personnel) who require access for the purpose of representing any 13 party in this action. 14 (b) Named parties. The named parties in this action. 15 (c) Experts and consultants. Outside experts or consultants retained 16 in connection with this action, provided that they first shall be 17 shown and shall read a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order, 18 and shall execute a Confidentiality Agreement in the form 19 attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel shall retain executed 20 Confidentiality Agreements for consultants and experts, but shall 21 not be required to produce them absent Court order upon showing 22 of good cause. 23 (d) Witnesses. Witnesses who testify at depositions, hearings, or trial, 24 if any such further proceedings occur in this case. 25 (e) Court reporters and videographers. Court reporters and 26 videographers appearing at depositions, hearings, or trial, if any 27 such further proceedings occur in this case. 1 (g) Vendors. Vendors hired by a party to host data and maintain a 2 database of electronic data or perform other work related to the 3 collection, review, or production of documents in this case. 4 (h) Other persons. Without the necessity of a Court order, any other 5 person who the parties jointly agree may have access to the 6 Confidential Information. 7 5. Non-Waiver of Confidentiality or Objection to Production. 8 Review of Confidential Information by any person in paragraph 4 shall not waive 9 the confidentiality of that information. 10 6. Inadvertent Disclosure of Confidential Information. The 11 inadvertent, unintentional, or in camera disclosure of Confidential Information shall 12 not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of any party’s claim of confidentiality. 13 Within fifteen (15) days of discovering such inadvertent or unintentional disclosure, 14 any party to this Order may advise the other parties that the Confidential 15 Information is to be designated as Confidential under the terms of this Order. 16 7. Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Information.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patricia Laucella v. Medtronic, Inc., (C.D. Cal. 2025).

Patricia Laucella v. Medtronic, Inc. (Patricia Laucella v. Medtronic, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.