Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock
Opinion
Opinion issued January 31, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00613-CV ——————————— PATRICIA JAHNS, Appellant V. STUART BLACKSTOCK, Appellee
On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 43443
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Patricia Jahns, has neither paid the required filing fee for this
appeal nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must
pay—at the time an item is presented for filing—whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order.”), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing
indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (West Supp. 2012),
§.51.941(a) (West 2005), § 101.041 (West Supp. 2012) (listing fees in court of
appeals); Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and
the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation,
Misc. Docket No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app.
A § B(1) (listing fees in court of appeals). The filing fee was due on July 16, 2012.
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing
involuntary dismissal of case).
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. We dismiss any pending
motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Brown.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock (Patricia Jahns v. Stuart Blackstock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.