Patricia G. Fleeman v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company

Fifth Circuit

Patricia G. Fleeman v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company

424 F.2d 1124, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9984

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 1970

Docket28498

StatusPublished

This text of 424 F.2d 1124 (Patricia G. Fleeman v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patricia G. Fleeman v. Liberty National Life Insurance Company, 424 F.2d 1124, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9984 (5th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to our Rule 18 this ease is decided without oral argument.

On March 1, 1967, the Liberty National Life Insurance Company issued a certain insurance policy on the life of Timothy David Fleeman. The controversy in the Court below was whether this policy had lapsed for non-payment of premiums prior to Mr. Fleeman’s death, which occurred October 4, 1967. The District Judge heard the evidence, without a jury, and found that the policy had lapsed and had not been reinstated. The record reflects substantial evidence to support the finding. It, therefore, cannot be clearly erroneous and must be affirmed under Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to our Rule 18 this ease is decided without oral argument.

On March 1, 1967, the Liberty National Life Insurance Company issued a certain insurance policy on the life of Timothy David Fleeman. The controversy in the Court below was whether this policy had lapsed for non-payment of premiums prior to Mr. Fleeman’s death, which occurred October 4, 1967. The District Judge heard the evidence, without a jury, and found that the policy had lapsed and had not been reinstated. The record reflects substantial evidence to support the finding. It, therefore, cannot be clearly erroneous and must be affirmed under Rule 52(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

424 F.2d 1124, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 9984, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-g-fleeman-v-liberty-national-life-insurance-company-ca5-1970.