Home/Ninth Circuit/Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

222 F.3d 614
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2000·No. 97-17062·Published

Opinion

222 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2000)

PATRICIA E. GENTALA; ROBERT A. GENTALA, Plaintiffs-Appellants Cross Appellees,
v.
CITY OF TUCSON Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant.

No. 97-17062, 97-17069

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FILED AUG 18, 2000

D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ

Before: HUG, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the NinthCircuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, 222 F.3d 614 (9th Cir. 2000).

222 F.3d 614 (Patricia E. Gentala Robert A. Gentala, Cross v. City of Tucson Arizona, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.