Patricia E. Gentala and Robert A. Gentala, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees v. The City of Tucson, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

275 F.3d 1160, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 220, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 159, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 221

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: January 8, 2002
• Docket: 97-17062
• Status: Published

Opinion

275 F.3d 1160 (9th Cir. 2002)

PATRICIA E. GENTALA AND ROBERT A. GENTALA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS-CROSS-APPELLEES
v.
THE CITY OF TUCSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT

Nos. 97-17062, 97-17069
D.C. No. CV-97-00327-FRZ

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed Jan 8, 2002

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, Thomas G. Nelson, Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Barry G. Silverman, Susan P. Graber, M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, William A. Fletcher, Ronald M. Gould, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The motion for further briefing and oral argument is DENIED.

This case is before us on remand from the United States Supreme Court. Gentala v. City of Tucson, _______ U.S._______, 122 S.Ct. 340, 151 L.Ed.2d 256 (2001). We remand to the district court for reconsideration in light of Good News Club v. Milford Central School, 533 U.S. 98, 121 S.Ct. 2093, 150 L.Ed.2d 151 (2000), including such evidentiary proceedings as may be appropriate.

Judge Fernandez dissents.