Patricia Cox v. DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, et

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 29, 2016
Docket15-60421
StatusUnpublished

This text of Patricia Cox v. DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, et (Patricia Cox v. DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, et) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patricia Cox v. DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, et, (5th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Case: 15-60421 Document: 00513815620 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/29/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals

No. 15-60421 Fifth Circuit

FILED Summary Calendar December 29, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce PATRICIA A. COX, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

DESOTO COUNTY JAIL OF HERNANDO; STATE OF MISSISSIPPI; MEDICAL STAFF AND POLICE OFFICERS, DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, Mississippi; SERGEANT FERGUSON; BRANDON; SHERRI; WALTER; PATRICIA; LIEUTENANT BLONDEE,

Defendants-Appellees

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:13-CV-226

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Patricia Cox filed this suit to challenge alleged violations of her rights that occurred while she was jailed. The district court dismissed the suit after determining, inter alia, that she had failed to serve the defendants with process. Cox does not address the propriety of the district court’s conclusion

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 15-60421 Document: 00513815620 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/29/2016

No. 15-60421

that the suit should be dismissed for want of service. Because Cox has failed to identify any error in the district court’s analysis of the question whether her suit should be dismissed for want of service, she has waived this issue. See Hughes v. Johnson, 191 F.3d 607, 613 (5th Cir. 1999); Brinkmann v. Dallas County Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED, and Cox’s request for appointed counsel is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patricia Cox v. DeSoto County Jail of Hernando, et, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-cox-v-desoto-county-jail-of-hernando-et-ca5-2016.