Patricia Cortez v. Diana Santillana Soriano
Opinion
Opinion issued May 22, 2025
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00086-CV ——————————— PATRICIA CORTEZ, Appellant V. DIANA SANTILLANA SORIANO, Appellee
On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 522256-401
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Patricia Cortez, has filed her notice of appeal on February 5, 2025.
Appellant did not pay the appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes of
appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant that unless she paid the appellate filing fee by March 31, 2025, her appeal
could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b). To date, appellant has not paid the
appellate filing fee nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.
Appellant also failed to pay, or make arrangements to pay, the fee for
preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145; TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1. We
notified appellant that her appeal could be dismissed for want of prosecution if the
clerk’s record was not filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(a), (b). We directed appellant
to submit written evidence from the trial court clerk by April 11, 2025, reflecting
she paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. To
date, appellant has not responded to this Court’s notice and the clerk’s record has
not been filed.
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b),
42.3(b)–(c). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
Panel consists of Justices Guerra, Caughey, and Morgan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patricia Cortez v. Diana Santillana Soriano (Patricia Cortez v. Diana Santillana Soriano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.