Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates

CourtCourt of Appeals of Tennessee
DecidedApril 15, 1999
Docket3A01-9809-CV-00311
StatusPublished

This text of Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates (Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates, (Tenn. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

IN T H E C O U R T O F A P P E A L S O F T E N N E S S E E FL E D I A T K N O X V IL L E A p r il 1 5 , 1 9 9 9

C e c il C r o w s o n , J r . A p p e lla te C o u r t C le r k

P A T R IC IA A N N E P E H L M A N , ) C /A N O . 0 3 A 0 1 -9 8 0 9 -C V -0 0 3 1 1 ) A p p e ll a n t, ) K N O X C IR C U IT ) v . ) H O N . B IL L S W A N N , ) JU D G E G R E G O R Y L A W R E N C E P E H L M A N , ) ) A p p e lle e , ) ) a n d ) ) S O B IE S K I, M E S S E R & A S S O C IA T E S , ) A F F IR M E D ) A N D In te rv e n o r. ) R E M A N D E D

R O B E R T L . C R O S S L E Y , T H E C R O S S L E Y L A W F I R M , P .C ., K n o x v ille , f o r A p p e ll a n t.

D A N IE L L . T A Y L O R , M e m p h is , fo r A p p e lle e .

W A N D A G . S O B IE S K I, S O B IE S K I, M E S S E R & A S S O C IA T E S , K n o x v ille , f o r In te rv e n o r.

O P I N I O N

F ra n k s, J.

I n t h i s a c ti o n P a t r i c i a A n n e P e h l m a n e s s e n ti a l l y s e e k s a d e c la r a t i o n t h a t

m a r i t a l p r o p e rt y a w a r d e d to h e r i n a d iv o r c e i s n o t s u b j e c t t o a li e n in f a v o r o f t h e

in te rv e n o r.

T h e i n t e r v e n o r in i tia lly r e p r e s e n t e d G r e g o r y P e h l m a n i n t h e P e h l m a n s ’

d iv o r c e s u it. D u r in g p e n d e n c y o f th e a c tio n in te rv e n o r w ith d r e w f r o m r e p re s e n tin g G r e g o r y a n d G r e g o r y a n d i n t e r v e n o r a g r e e d o n t h e a m o u n t o f a tt o r n e y ’ s f e e s th e n d u e

i n te rv e n o r, a s r e f l e c t e d in a N o te s i g n e d b y G r e g o ry . I n te rv e n o r f i l e d a l i e n l i s

p e n d e n s o n th e p r o p e r ty i n t h e R e g i s te r o f D e e d s O f f ic e a n d n o tic e o f lie n i n t h e

d iv o rc e a c tio n . S u b s e q u e n tly , th e P e h lm a n s w e re d iv o rc e d a n d th e D iv o rc e D e c re e

r e c i t e s t h a t “ [ t ] h e p a r t i e s a n n o u n c e d a s e tt l e m e n t o f t h e is s u e s i n th is d iv o r c e

l i t i g a ti o n , a n d u p o n s a id a n n o u n c e m e n t t h e C o u r t a p p ro v e d th e ir i n c o r p o r a ti o n i n t o a

f i n a l d e c r e e o f a b s o lu te d iv o r c e ” , a n d a s t o th e m a ri t a l p r o p e rt y , t h e D e c r e e p r o v id e d :

A s a d iv i s i o n o f m a r i t a l p r o p e rt y p u r s u a n t t o T .C .A . § 3 6 - 4 -1 2 1 w ife s h a ll r e c e iv e t h e r e s id e n c e o f th e p a r tie s lo c a t e d a t 1 9 4 7 G re n a d e B o u le v a r d , K n o x v ille , T e n n e s s e e 3 7 9 2 2 . H u s b a n d s h a ll e x e c u te a q u it c la im d e e d tr a n s f e r r in g h i s in t e r e s t in s a id r e s id e n c e to t h e w if e , a n d s a id e x e c u te d q u it c la im d e e d s h a ll b e h e l d b y h u s b a n d ’s a tt o r n e y , in e sc ro w , u n til th is d e c r e e o f d iv o r c e b e c o m e s f in a l. H u s b a n d s h a ll b e s o le ly r e s p o n s i b le f o r im m e d ia te ly r e s o lv in g h is d is p u te w i t h W a n d a S o b ie sk i, s o t h a t h e r a tt o r n e y l i e n i s r e m o v e d f r o m t h e r e s i d e n c e .

S u b s e q u e n tly , P a tric ia f ile d a M o tio n to Q u a s h I n te rv e n o r ’s L ie n , a n d N o tic e , w h ic h

h a d b e e n f ile d p u r s u a n t to T .C .A . § 2 3 - 2 -1 0 2 , f o r le g a l s e rv ic e s r e n d e re d G re g o r y in

t h e d iv o r c e a c t i o n . S u b s e q u e n tl y , t h e T r i a l C o u r t d e te r m i n e d :

T h e s e ttle m e n t th a t r e s u lte d i n a f in a l d e c r e e o f a b s o l u t e d i v o r c e v e s te d t h e p a r tie s m a r ita l r e s id e n c e in t h e p la in t if f /c o u n t e r - d e f e n d a n t.

P l a in t i f f / c o u n te r - d e f e n d a n t t o o k s u c h p ro p e rt y w i t h f u l l k n o w l e d g e o f t h e r e c o r d e d li e n a n d s u b j e c t t o s a id l i e n , a n d th a t t h e li e n s u r v i v e d th e d iv o r c e d e c r e e .

P a tr i c ia a p p e a l e d th a t o r d e r t o th is C o u r t a n d w e re m a n d e d , u p o n

d e te r m i n i n g t h a t t h e ju d g m e n t o r d e r e d th e h u s b a n d to r e s o l v e h is d i s p u t e w i t h h i s

fo r m e r a tto r n e y , a n d w e n o te d “ th e ju d g m e n t p r o v id e s , to r e so lv e h is d is p u te w ith

i n t e r v e n o r , n o t o n l y a s to t h e a m o u n t o f th e f e e , b u t a s to t h e v a li d i t y o f th e l i e n ” .

U p o n r e m a n d a n d a rg u m e n t o f c o u n s e l a n d re c e ip t o f e v id e n c e th e T r i a l C o u r t r u le d :

T h is C o u rt c o n firm s th a t its in te n t w ith re sp e c t to la n g u ag e “ r e s o l v e d h is d is p u te ” a n d th is C o u rt’ s o rd e r o f A u g u s t 1 4 , 1 9 9 6 , w a s sim p ly th a t M r. P e h lm a n p a y h is c o u n s e l. T h e re is n o d is p u te a s to th e li e n , th e p r o p r ie t y o f th e l ie n , th e f e e s c la im e d , o r a n y o th e r m a tte r b e tw e e n M r. P e h lm a n a n d th e in te rv e n o r.

2 T h e C o u r t t h e n re a f f i r m e d it s f o r m e r h o ld i n g “ in a ll r e s p e c t s ” .

P a tric ia h a s a g a in a p p e a le d to th is C o u rt in s is tin g th e lie n is in v a lid

b e c a u s e th e h u s b a n d d id n o t “ r e c o v e r ” th e m a r ita l r e s id e n c e , a n d th e s ta tu t o r y lie n

f a ile d b e c a u s e it w a s n o t d e c l a r e d i n t h e f in a l d e c r e e .

N o t ic e o f th e s ta tu t o r y lie n w a s file d i n t h e d iv o r c e a c tio n , a n d th e

d is p o s itio n o f th e m a rita l e s ta te w a s a t is s u e in th a t a c tio n . G re g o ry v o lu n ta rily

d e e d e d h i s in t e r e s t t o P a t r i c i a a s a p a r t o f th e d i v o r c e s e tt l e m e n t , a n d s h e a c c e p t e d a s

t h e T r i a l J u d g e fo u n d “ w i t h f u l l k n o w l e d g e o f t h e re c o r d e d li e n , a n d s u b je c t t o s a id

lie n ” . T h e o p e ra tio n a l e ff e c t o f th is lie n is n o t u n lik e th e c irc u m s ta n c e s in T h ir d

N a t i o n a l B a n k in N a s h v il l e v . N o b le r , 7 8 9 S . W .2 d 2 5 4 ( T e n n . 1 9 9 0 ) . I n N o b le r ,

d u rin g th e p e n d e n c y o f a n a c tio n fo r d iv o rc e b e tw e e n th e N o b le rs , a c re d ito r o f th e

h u s b a n d le v ie d o n s o m e r e a l p r o p e r t y w h i c h th e N o b l e r s o w n e d a s t e n a n t s b y th e

e n tire ty . T h e T ria l J u d g e o r d e re d th e p ro p e rty s o ld in th e d iv o rc e a c tio n , a n d th e

S u p r e m e C o u r t u ltim a te ly h e ld th a t th e rig h t o f s u r v iv o r s h ip p r e v io u s ly c o n v e y e d o r

a tt a c h e d b y a ju d g m e n t c r e d it o r w a s n o t d e s t r o y e d b y th e d is s o l u t i o n o f t h e te n a n c y b y

t h e e n t i r e ti e s , a n d c o n c lu d e d th a t t h e ju d g m e n t c r e d it o r w a s e n ti t l e d to t h e

s u r v i v o r s h ip i n t e r e s t in t h e p r o p e r ty t o t h e e x te n t o f th e c r e d ito r ’s in t e r e s t.

I t i s g e n e r a ll y h e l d t h a t t h e t r a n s f e r o f p r o p e r t y s u b s e q u e n t t o t h e

a t t a c h m e n t o f a li e n d o e s n o t a f f e c t t h e l i e n . S e e M i c h ig a n v . U n i t e d S ta t e s , 3 1 7 U .S .

3 3 8 , 3 4 0 6 3 S .C t. 3 0 2 , 3 0 3 , 8 7 L .E d . 3 1 2 . A s p o u s e m a y c o n v e y h e r r ig h t o f

s u r v i v o r s h i p w i t h o u t c o n s e n t o f t h e o th e r. S e e R o b in s o n v .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Patricia Anne Pehlman v. Gregory Lawrence Pehlman and Sobieski and Associates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-anne-pehlman-v-gregory-lawrence-pehlman-a-tennctapp-1999.