Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, Stanley Tool Division

Fourth Circuit

Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, Stanley Tool Division

53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16750, 1995 WL 247357

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 27, 1995

Docket94-1945

StatusPublished

This text of 53 F.3d 328 (Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, Stanley Tool Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, Stanley Tool Division, 53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16750, 1995 WL 247357 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Patricia A. McCRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
THE STANLEY WORKS, Stanley Tool Division, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-1945.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 5, 1995
Decided April 27, 1995.

ARGUED: Mary P. Miles, Columbia, SC, for Appellant. Stephen X. Munger, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Linda Vallar Whisenhunt, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this Title VII action, Appellant Patricia A. McCray (McCray) appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment against her in favor of Appellee The Stanley Works. McCray asserts that the district court did not allow her to complete discovery and did not afford her an opportunity to prove allegations of retaliatory discharge and sex discrimination. Following careful consideration of the parties' arguments, and upon review of the record, the magistrate's report and recommendation, and the district court's order, we conclude that this appeal is meritless. We, therefore, affirm based upon the reasoning of the district court. Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, C/A No. 4:93-1690-21JI (D.S.C. June 14, 1994).

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Patricia A. McCRAY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
THE STANLEY WORKS, Stanley Tool Division, Defendant--Appellee.

No. 94-1945.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued April 5, 1995
Decided April 27, 1995.

ARGUED: Mary P. Miles, Columbia, SC, for Appellant. Stephen X. Munger, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Linda Vallar Whisenhunt, JACKSON, LEWIS, SCHNITZLER & KRUPMAN, Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In this Title VII action, Appellant Patricia A. McCray (McCray) appeals the district court's entry of summary judgment against her in favor of Appellee The Stanley Works. McCray asserts that the district court did not allow her to complete discovery and did not afford her an opportunity to prove allegations of retaliatory discharge and sex discrimination. Following careful consideration of the parties' arguments, and upon review of the record, the magistrate's report and recommendation, and the district court's order, we conclude that this appeal is meritless. We, therefore, affirm based upon the reasoning of the district court. Patricia A. McCray v. The Stanley Works, C/A No. 4:93-1690-21JI (D.S.C. June 14, 1994).

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 F.3d 328, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 16750, 1995 WL 247357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/patricia-a-mccray-v-the-stanley-works-stanley-tool-ca4-1995.