Patrice Kerr v. State of Florida, State Attorney's Office, Public Defender Office, State Attorney Lawson Lamar, ASA Sarah Freeman, City of Orlando, APD Schilling, Brianna Thomas, Tanya Davis, and Orange County
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D18-2850 _____________________________
PATRICE KERR,
Petitioner,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE, STATE ATTORNEY LAWSON LAMAR, ASA SARAH FREEMAN, CITY OF ORLANDO, APD SCHILLING, BRIANNA THOMAS, TANYA DAVIS, and ORANGE COUNTY,
Respondents. _____________________________
Petition for Writ of Prohibition–Original Jurisdiction.
October 24, 2018
PER CURIAM.
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.
ROBERTS, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Patrice Kerr, pro se, Petitioner.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Patrice Kerr v. State of Florida, State Attorney's Office, Public Defender Office, State Attorney Lawson Lamar, ASA Sarah Freeman, City of Orlando, APD Schilling, Brianna Thomas, Tanya Davis, and Orange County (Patrice Kerr v. State of Florida, State Attorney's Office, Public Defender Office, State Attorney Lawson Lamar, ASA Sarah Freeman, City of Orlando, APD Schilling, Brianna Thomas, Tanya Davis, and Orange County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.